Familia: Hesperiidae
Subfamilia: Coeliadinae
Genus: Hasora
Species: Hasora discolor
Subspecies: H. d. discolor –H. d. eira –H. d. mastusia –H. d. splendida

Hasora discolor
Taxonavigation: Papilionoidea 

Superregnum: Eukaryota
Cladus: Unikonta
Cladus: Opisthokonta
Cladus: Holozoa
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: ParaHoxozoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Cladus: Protostomia
Cladus: Ecdysozoa
Cladus: Panarthropoda
Phylum: Arthropoda
Cladus: Pancrustacea
Cladus: Allotriocarida
Subphylum: Hexapoda
Classis: Insecta
Cladus: Dicondylia
Subclassis: Pterygota
Infraclassis: Neoptera
Cladus: Eumetabola
Cladus: Holometabola
Superordo: Panorpida
Cladus: Amphiesmenoptera
Ordo: Lepidoptera
Subordo: Glossata
Cladus: Coelolepida
Cladus: Myoglossata
Cladus: Neolepidoptera
Infraordo: Heteroneura
Cladus: Eulepidoptera
Cladus: Ditrysia
Cladus: Apoditrysia
Cladus: Obtectomera
Superfamilia: Papilionoidea

Name

edit

Hasora discolor Felder, C. & Felder, R., 1859.

Type locality: "Brasilien"; later "Java?" (Felder & Felder, 1867), probably erroneous for Indonesia, Maluku, Ambon ("Amboina"), after Fruhstorfer, 1911, also Evans, 1949.

Typus: Lectotype female, ♀* BMNH [Originally said to be male, but subsequent type designation female after Evans, 1949]

Synonymy

edit
  • Goniloba discolor Felder & Felder, 1859: 405 [Note see Goniloba Westwood in Doubleday & Westwood, 1852: 511].
  • Ismene discolor (Felder & Felder, 1859); Felder & Felder, 1867; 526, pl. LXXII, fig. 17.
  • Hasora discolor (Felder & Felder, 1859); Meyrick & Lower, 1902: 123; Fruhstorfer, 1911: 64; Gerstaecker, 1862a: 453; Lower, 1911: 168; Seitz, [1927]: 1051, Pl.166f; Evans, 1949: 59; Bridges, 1994: IX.29; Common and Waterhouse 1981 [cited in Orr & Fliedner, 2011]; Chiba, 2009: 23; Orr and Kitching 2010 [cited in Orr & Fliedner, 2011]; Orr & Fliedner, 2011: 102; Toussaint, 2020: fig.1.
  • Hasora discolora (Felder & Felder, 1859); Braby, 2010: 49 (appendix list); Braby, 2011: 67; Braby, 2016: 66. [Note 1: In Braby's (2011) paper on "Addendum and Errata", it states that although Orr & Fliedner, 2011 suggest discolor as the 'correct' spelling (p.102), Braby (2011) disputes that "since discolorus, -a, -um is an adjective and the genus Hasora is feminine, the correct combination is Hasora discolora". However, this counterview fails to recognise that the protonym is "discolor" as a third-declension one-termination adjective, where inflection of the nominative singular feminine remains unchanged as discolor. It is not originally using a different (or arguably neolatinized) adjectival variant such as "discolorus" with three-terminations. Any speculated intention about the gender favored by various authors is irrelevant to the protonym formation as an invariable one-termination adjective in the nominative singular]. [Note 2: Otherwise, if gender agreement is ignored (as some in the lepidopterist community do, treating it as irrelevant), then the protonym "discolor" would be retained in same formation as discolor].

See also

References

edit

Primary references

edit

Additional references

edit
edit
 
For more multimedia, look at Hasora discolor on Wikimedia Commons.