Wikispecies:Bots/Requests for approval/KasparBot

Hello, I am requesting bot status for my authority control bot:

-- T.seppelt (talk) 05:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

edit
[Any questions, answers and conference here, please.]

Votes

edit
  1.  Support. T.seppelt is a highly-experienced editor and bot user. This activiity is being undertaken at my request. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support. Seems reasonable to me so I am good with this. Faendalimas talk 22:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bots in a trial period

edit
  Approved for trial (7 days). Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 22:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
@Tommy Kronkvist:   Done I didn't notice any malfunction so far. Please have a look at the edits. -- T.seppelt (talk) 13:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I checked a random sample of around ten edits, finding no errors, yet much that is beneficial. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A great new feature to Wikispecies. Thank you! --Murma174 (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tommy Kronkvist: Are you happy to approve this, fully, now? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
@Pigsonthewing: I can't see any problems with the bot, but formally I think the full seven day trial period should expire before any bureaucrat decides to approve or disapprove the bot's final status. Besides, yes it really is a formality: all bots are full members of the "bot" user group during the entire trial period (see User talk:KasparBot), or else they wouldn't be able to do any proper trialling. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 17:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]