Welcome to Wikispecies!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikispecies! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

If you have named a taxon, then it is likely that there is (or will be) a Wikispecies page about you, and other pages about your published papers. Please see our advice and guidance for taxon authors.

If you have useful images to contribute to Wikispecies, please upload them at Wikimedia Commons. This is also true for video or audio files containing bird songs, whale vocalization, etc.

Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username (if you're logged in) and the date. Please also read the Wikispecies policy What Wikispecies is not. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or in the Village Pump. Again, welcome! -- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Prunus edits

edit

Hello. Please note that the information displayed in [1] does not belong on a template but on a taxon page. Please read through the Help Section and browse previously created pages before making any more edits. You may have your edits removed without warning. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 10:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear Andyboorman, thank you for mentioning how to solve the problem I had with the taxon template. See "Table 1. Subdivisions of Prunus s.l. in some classifications" in the Shuo Shi et al. (2013) (DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12095) for the proposed new Prunus subg. and sect. after phylogenetic analyses. The three subgenus: Padus (including subclades Laurocerasus, Maddenia, Padus and Pygeum), Cerasus, and Prunus. And inside subg. Prunus there are seven sections: Amygdalus, Armeniaca, Emplectocladus, Microcerasus, Persicae, Prunocerasus, and Prunus. They are also given on the Wikipedia-page of Prunus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prunus). I will search for other ways to reference the subgenes and sections. Thank you for your advice! EllieBellie25 (talk) 12:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Also check out how to cite references here on WS its in the Help Section and on taxon pages. Also I thought Prunus subgen. Padus was polyphyletic and no longer supported, as indicated in Shuo Shi et al. (2013). This is probably the reason it has not been created in the past in favour of Subgenus: P. subg. Cerasus, Sectio: P. sect. Laurocerasus. The one ref you use is not very helpful on its own. But hey I am not a Prunus expert, but just warning you there may be reverts in the near future! Andyboorman (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
WS definitely does not use WP as a source, but it is OK a pointer I guess. I found this using Google Scholar - Eisenman, S.W. 2015. Some nomenclatural adjustments and typifications for almond species in the genus Prunus sensu lato (Rosaceae). Phytotaxa, 222(3): 185-198. [2] it may help, as it has a good discussion supporting Shi et al. I do think you are on the right track both with the three subgenera and edits. Good luck! Andyboorman (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Template:Li et al., 2022a

edit

Hi! I revert your action in Template:Li et al., 2022a, please if you want create a reference template, follow the order, Li et al., 2022c, and so on, don't change other templates as you do in Li et al., 2022a. Regards, Burmeister (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello EllieBellie25. Just as a pointer, the reason Burmeister's remark is important is of course that the "original" {{Li et al., 2022a}} template is already in use on several other pages. The information on those pages will be wrong if the template is changed to cite an entirely different scientific work in another journal. Best regards, Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 10:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC).Reply