Wikispecies

Wikispecies:Administrators/Archive 1

< Wikispecies:Administrators
English: This page contains a finished discussion. Do not edit it, please.
català: Aquesta pàgina conté una discussió ja finalitzada. No l'editi, per favor.
Deutsch: Diese Seite enthält eine abgeschlossene Diskussion. Bitte nicht weiter bearbeiten.
suomi: Tämän sivun keskustelut ovat päättyneet. Ethän muokkaa niitä. Kiitos!
español: Esta página contiene una discusión ya finalizada. No la edite, por favor.
português: Esta página contém uma discussão já concluída. Não edite, por favor.
svenska: Den här sidan är en arkiverad diskussion. Var vänlig redigera den inte.
українська: Ця сторінка містить обговорення, які вже завершилися. Прохання її не редагувати.

Requests for administrator status

User:geni

I have been working on wikimedia projects since March 2004 mostly on the English Wikipedia but various others from time to time. I have been an admin on the English Wikipedia since December 2004. I have noticed there is a fair bit of admin housework to be done on this wiki and would like to be able to help. I would also like to be able to use the rollback feature in future cases of mass vandalismGeni 18:50, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

support

  1. Benedikt
  2. Josh

oppose

neutral

comments

At the moment, I am the only admin on wikispecies: not experienced with the technology aspects of the wiki-world and not familiar with the customs and conventions of the wikipedians. I appreciate any support and involvement in particular if other administrators can contribute skills I am lacking - thank you very much! Best, --[[User:Benedikt|Benedikt]



UtherSRG

I am a primary contributor on en:'s and projects and articles.

On , I have been an admin since April 2004, by (according to ) the most overwhelming concensus in 2.5 years. I understand the responsibilities of being an admin. Currently I support admin efforts here on Species by tagging junk articles with {{delete}} so they can be found on Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion. - UtherSRG 12:59, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

support

  1. of courseGeni 21:19, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  2. --Benedikt
  3. Josh Grosse

I have made an UtherSRG an admin here. It might be good to nominate someone to be a bureaucrat so this wiki can handle admin requests itself rather than needing a steward. Angela 10:26, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Dan Koehl

UtherSRG wrote having a few more admins wouldn't be a bad thing so I apply to be admin. I have been editing here since november 2004, and I am active as admin on sv.wikipedia since 2002. I am aware of, and will follow relevant policies and respect consensus of Wikispecies' users. Dan Koehl 18:08, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

support

  1. UtherSRG 00:05, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benedikt 10:05, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Warofdreams 27 June 2005 16:36 (UTC)

oppose

neutral

comments


Ucucha

I want to be an admin here, because I:

  1. Want to be able to revert vandalism quicker.
  2. Will have to delete very many images in a few weeks :-).

I know I'm not very active yet, but I think I'll be a good admin for Wikispecies. User:Ucucha (talk) 13:57, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

support

  1. You're one of the more active users, don't kid yourself. You've shown yourself to be a fine contributor and you'll be a fine admin. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:32, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dan Koehl 15:08, 16 September 2005 (UTC). Yes, good work!![reply]
  3. Thanks for the active work you did so far and good luck as an admin! --Benedikt 19:16, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I agree with all the above. Go for it. Open2universe 00:25, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

oppose

neutral

comments

Lycaon

I would like to be an admin here, because I think this Wiki can use more admins to fight spam and vandalism. There have been several cases lately and the other Admins haven't been visiting (too busy elsewhere I suppose). All I can do now is reverting and adding {{delete}}s.
I have been editing here since September 2005 (I know, I'm still learning the ropes), and I am aware of, and will follow relevant policies and respect consensus of Wikispecies' users. — Lycaon 13:08, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This vote ends on 4 November 2005 13:08.

Poll has ended; Lycaon is an admin now. Ucucha (talk) 13:26, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SUPPORT

  1. Benedikt 14:46, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ucucha (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC) we don't have many policies to follow as yet, but who cares?[reply]
  3. Open2universe 00:59, 28 October 2005 (UTC) Good luck![reply]
  4. UtherSRG (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OPPOSE

COMMENTS

  1. Despite the fact that he and I disagree on the use of (extinct) v. †. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


っ (Rest)

I'm a Japanese speaker, active at Japanese Wikipedia, Japanese Wikinews and Commons, and a bureaucrat at Japanese Wikinews. I'm inactive here and I'm not familiar with biology, but I can help something about Japanese language and Japanese users, for example, [[MediaWiki:....../ja]] pages.

Language: ja-N, en-2, de-2. --っ 07:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote starts 1 March 2006 13:30, vote closes 8 March 2006 13:30. (a bit too late)

Poll closed. There is not enough support for adminship. Ucucha (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. ....

Oppose

  1. Ucucha (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC) I don't see why you need adminship here to help Japanese users.[reply]

Open2universe

I want to be an admin here, because:

  1. With Lycaon on leave we could use more coverage
  2. I already revert vandalism when I see it
  3. I am on most every day and will be able to respond to issues in a somewhat timely fashion.

Open2universe 01:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote starts 1 March 2006 01:25, vote closes 8 March 2006 01:25.

Poll closed. Open2universe is now an admin. Ucucha (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support (Open2universe)

  1. Ucucha (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Of course![reply]
  2. You ain't one yet? Shame on us! - user:UtherSRG (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Absolutely yes. Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 15:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. at last :-) Lycaon 16:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC) (home for the weekend)[reply]
  5. Absolutamente de acuerdo Alberto Salguero 16:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (Open2universe)

  1. ...

Keith Edkins

I want to be an admin here, because:

  1. I am reliably informed we could use more coverage
  2. I already revert vandalism and change nonconforming pages when I see them
  3. I have been active here 4 months; on en.wikipedia 2 years; agree with the goals of the project & have a user page on Wikispecies
  4. I have made a lot of additions recently and it would be nice to be able correct the occasional mistake myself without passing to someone else. Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 07:54, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote starts 2 March 2006 08:00, vote closes 9 March 2006 08:00.

Poll closed. Keith Edkins is an admin now. Ucucha (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support (Keith Edkins)

  1. Ucucha (talk) 13:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Absolutely yes Open2universe 13:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oh yeah. - user:UtherSRG (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sure!!! - Lycaon 16:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Absolutamente de acuerdo Alberto Salguero 16:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (Keith Edkins)

  1. ...


Lightdarkness

Hi there, I'm Lightdarkness from the English wikipedia. In the past few days, there has been an on going attack against Wikispecies. The vandals have attacked during various times in the day, and there hasn't been anyone to clean it up. I've been temporarily sysop'd three times in the past few days, and at times it's very hard to find a Steward to change the rights. My actions as an administrator here would be purely reverting vandalism. I am about to become a sysop on the english wikipedia. I've setup the vandalism channel #vandalism-en-species on freenode (We're still waiting for the bot to be operational) if anyone is interested. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page here, or on en wiki. Cheers. --Lightdarkness 06:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote starts 17 April 2006 06:30, vote closes 23 April 2006 06:30.

Poll has ended, Lightdarkness is an admin now (even though he was so already ;-)). I made him a bureaucrat too. Ucucha (talk) 05:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support (Lightdarkness)

  1. It's always good to have vandal fighters :-). Ucucha (talk) 07:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. :-) Unfortunately, it doesn't look like Dagobyte is going to give up... Bookofjude 07:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Go for it Lightdarkness Lycaon 08:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes, and good luck. Open2universe 01:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sounds good to me. Keith Edkins (Talk) 16:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (Lightdarkness)

  1. ...

Onthost

I started editing the english wikipedia about 8 months ago and loved the idea of being able to edit an encyclopedia. I enjoy doing new page/recent change patrol and editing biology related articles. I am a biology student in Ontario, Canada and it is my passion in life. I just discovered wikispecies a week ago and i LOVE the idea behind it as it provides free access to information that was really only available freely to students and schools. I feel admin rights on wikispecies would help me keep vandalism down which will allow wikispecies to become a respected and trusted resource that students of all age levels can access and reference. If you have any questions and concerns feel free to ask me, I do hang out in #wikipedia on IRC (and will be joining #vandalism-en-species tonight as its a great idea!) if you perfer a real time conversation!

Poll has ended. Consensus has failed to be reached. --Lightdarkness 01:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Ucucha (talk) 19:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Still no edits apart from request for adminship and user page. Furthermore, he hasn't been in #vandalism-en-species despite his promise to do so.[reply]

Neutral

  1. Ucucha (talk) 13:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Please first do some edits - I don't think someone who doesn't have any "real" edits should be made an admin. Changed to "oppose".[reply]
  2. Open2universe 11:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC) I agree with Ucucha. I know we gave LightDarkness admin but they were clear it was for the sole purpose of fighting vandals.[reply]

Ormanbotanigi

Oppose

  1. No userpage. When running for sysop, you need to have a userpage. GangstaEB 00:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Totipotent

Howdy,
I have been an active member of Wikispecies since 22 April 2006 (my contributions). In that time I have tried to monitor Animalia for formatting continuity and have seemingly been the only one working on Culicidae, the mosquitoes, since 27 November 2005. In addition, I have given some attention to Araneae, alone with a few others (i.e., Trépas and Viki), and I wish to continue to do so. Both orders, and the taxa therein, do not get that much attention. I would like to be an administrator so I can continue to work with everyone on keeping the entire kingdom Animalia formatted correctly and to continue working on these neglected groups.
Sincerely,
Totipotent 17:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Vote starts 19 September 2006 17:36, vote closes 26 September 2006 17:36.

I believe Totipotent has the right for an official reply, now that the voting was closed --Kempm 14:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Totipotent is an admin now. However, this is a difficult decision because there has been no prior case where support or lack of support for a candidate has not been unanimous. Totipotent has 3 supports to 1 oppose (75%). I think this should be enough, but I recognize that others may not agree. Hopefully, this has been a good decision. Ucucha (talk) 17:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Considering Totipotent's recent edits, i agree with the outcome of the vote. Lycaon 19:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to thank Kempm, Lycaon, Open2universe, and Ucucha for your support. I am looking forward to working with everyone for years to come. Totipotent 20:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Kempm 08:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC) You got my vote. You meet the initial requirements, and as for Lycaon's arguments: I hope you can prove him wrong. One thing though... I hope you can raise your activity level a little bit :)[reply]
  2. Ucucha (talk) 17:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC) every good contributor should be an admin[reply]
  3. Open2universe 00:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC) Yes from me. I am glad you want to make that commitment to wikispecies.[reply]

Oppose

  1. Lycaon 20:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Your contributions are very much appreciated, please continue. There is however nothing you are doing at the moment that you need to be an administrator for. I haven't seen a single vandalism removal or vandal report in your edits. Also requests for deletions or blocks are non-existant. I can not support your candidature.[reply]

Neutral

Kempm

I'd like to 'run' for adminship as well. I can do most things without that possibility, but I think it would be nice to delete a vandal page right away, instead of adding the delete template. Also a revert button would help. Sorry, I don't have an election program, only want to continue adding content, and make wikispecies a better taxonomical resource.
--Kempm 14:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote ends 14:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC).

The vote has ended for some time now - Open2universe did already change user rights for Kempm. Ucucha (talk) 19:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Ucucha (talk) 17:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC) good candidate[reply]
  2. Lycaon 19:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Open2universe 20:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Yes![reply]
  4. Totipotent 21:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Kempm is very systematic in his approaches. He backs his work up with resources. In addition, he is great to work with.[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Pikminlover

I think that I could use adminship as there are only 12 admins and I think that I could really help out. I have an account on Wikipedia, where I am very useful. If I would become an admin, I would be sure to protect, delete, and block whenever I can. I will be happy to answer any questions. Thank you, Pikminlover 04:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vote starts 30 April 2007 04:09, vote closes 7 May 200Y 04:09.

Poll closed. There is not enough support for adminship. Lycaon 07:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. ....
  2. Even if he has a few edits, he has a lot of edit experience on Wikipedia. The sockpuppet thing is relly recent. Before that, he was a good user. 206.110.20.2 17:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Lycaon 06:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC) User account with no edits and severe sockpuppeting history on en:.[reply]
  2. Open2universe 02:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC) I agree with what Lycaon says[reply]
  3. Herby talk thyme 08:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC) per above.[reply]
  4. Ucucha (talk) 05:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CheetahKeeper

I wish to apply for adminship on wikispecies, i am a zoological professional and would like to contribute to wikispecies. I will at all times keep a neutral view point on articles, and will be fair and just in helping ensure editing privileges are not abused. I am the first to admit that i can make mistakes and for decisions that are shown to be mistakes i will accept that i was wrong and ensure i can fix the problem. I wish to help expand wikispecies as much as possible and attempt to ensure it is free from errors and help others do the same. Cheers and Kind Regards, Adrian. CheetahKeeper 05:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Vote starts 06 May 2007 05:40, vote closes 13 May 2007 05:42.[reply]

Support

Oppose

  1. Ucucha (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose for now; you have just about no edits on Wikispecies; you should first get some experience with Wikispecies before you become an admin.[reply]
  2. Lycaon 16:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dario and Mario

I wish to be an admin because I want to revert, protect and delete pages quickly. I don't speak English very well, but I can contribute very much to Wikispecies. I have many editions and experience. Thanks, Dario and Mario 15:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote starts 6 May 2007 15:10; vote ends 13 May 2007 15:10.

Support

  1. Ucucha (talk) 15:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lycaon 16:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Matasg

I can give you more orderliness...

Vote starts 10 July 2007 13:56, vote closes 18 July 2007 13:56.

Support

Oppose

  1. Lycaon 13:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC) User account with no edits[reply]
  2. Open2universe 02:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Same reasons as Lycaon[reply]
  3. —Curran (talk | contibs | random) 17:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)-- no mainspace edits (only User space)[reply]
  4. Ucucha (talk) 06:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC) see above[reply]

LpL

I want to became an admin. LeoPlaLeo

Poll closed - Leopardo Planante Leopardo has not got enough support. Ucucha (talk) 20:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Oppose

  1. No, thank you. Ucucha (talk) 19:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Not enough edits and none lately --Open2universe 11:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Per Ucucha. Lycaon 13:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EVula

Hello. I've been increasingly active on Wikispecies in the past month or so (usually in the form of interwiki maintenance[1], working on vernacular names[2], and adding images from Commons[3]), and I'm starting to run across more vandalism. It'd be handy if I could just delete junk articles myself, rather than tagging them.

As my userpage states, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia (where I'm the most active, with over 22,000 edits), Wikimedia Commons and Meta. I'm no stranger to being an admin, and I'm looking forward to helping out here even more than I currently do. Thanks. :) EVula // talk // 07:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poll closed. EVula is now an admin. --Open2universe 12:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Ucucha (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC) good edits, admin experience and a good nomination: good luck![reply]
  2. Kempm 21:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC) There's lots to be done.[reply]
  3. Open2universe 04:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Monobi

Hi all. I wasn't really expecting to be asking for sysop access, but I figured it could be useful. I've only been here for a short time, but am heavily interested in wikispecies. It's my most edited Wikimedia project :). If I had sysop access it would be mostly used to deal with vandalism (deleting vandalism pages, etc) and possibly editing protected pages when needed instead of bugging the current admins. I've also made edits outside of wikispecies linking back in [4], [5]. I'm knowledgeable about the sysop tools; I'm an admin on a non-wikimedia project, cluenet, so I understand how they work. Even if I don't become an admin, I'll still be hanging out here helping out; I think wikispecies is a great project. Thanks, Mønobi 01:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote closed 8 January 2006. Delayed by holiday schedules.

  • Poll closed. It is very close, but there is not enough support for adminship. (I am not counting the vote from User:Redrocketboy. This vote is the only editing they have done) Please try again in a month or two when you have some more editing under your belt. It seems likely you will succeed then. Thank you for your contributions. --Open2universe | Talk 13:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks. Sorry I've been inactive lately, but I hope to get back to editing again as the holiday season has ended and I've finished up my sport for the winter. Thanks, Mønobi 16:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. I'll happily support. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I'm not active here. However, Monobi is active, and is tagging stuff for deletion that is taking forever to be deleted. I don't see why he can't be one. Although, 20 days is incredibly early. Please wait around a while next time. Thanks, Redrocketboy 23:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. RRB gives great reasons. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I Support --Tomahiv 14:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

You have only been around for less than 20 days. I think more experience is required. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To extend my comment: I think you are doing really well from what you have been doing over thelast 17 days. If you keep at it, I will most definitely support next time, Monobi. Don't give up. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I understand. I mainly decided to list myself here because vandalism wasn't getting deleted and was hanging around, like this which still hasn't been deleted even though I tagged it 18 hours ago :). I also based it off EVula who was active for ~1 month before listing himself. Thanks, Mønobi 23:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That is precisely the reason I have supported (that page still not deleted). Redrocketboy 23:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to support based on the above. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Please wait for a few months to get some more experience. Ucucha (talk) 14:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Reluctant oppose. I think I little more time is warranted. User:EVula was a very different case, with vast amounts of wikipedia experience. Please don't give up and try again in a month or so.--Open2universe 15:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is still very early. Please get more experience. -- Dario and Mario 21:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Monobi's contributions are great. But a bit more time as wikispecies editor would be in place. Keep up the good work and I'll happily support your candidacy. --Kempm 14:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous Dissident

Hey. I really didn't expect to be requesting sysop status here; I have my plate quite full (although, I am managing well) on other projects - I am an admin on 4 other WMF wikis (the most active of which being the English Wikipedia). However, despite the recent promotion of EVula, the clearing of backlogs, such as, say, the speedy deletion backlog, is often quite slow; couple of days back, there was a two day old request in there for example. Considering that I come on here easily every day, I think I could use my experience as an admin to be of use in keeping Wikispecies up to date. I also feel that I have come to understand the workings of Wikispecies, and it's qualities as a project, during my time spent here. Thank you for considering my candidacy. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poll closed; Anonymous Dissident is now an admin. Ucucha (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Very strong support I work with Anonymous Dissident on 3 other projects, and while I am virtually inactive on Species, from my experience of him in other places, he is kind, hardworking, and trustworthy. Wikispecies could clearly do with another active admin, and AD is an excellent choice. Good luck! Majorly 10:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ucucha (talk) 17:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC) (though it is a bit weird that someone "virtually inactive" here would find this nomination in six minutes). Ucucha (talk) 17:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Hardly "canvassing". I persuaded him to run, and so I supported him. That's not bad, really. Majorly 17:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, thanks for explaining. Never mind. Ucucha (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sounds good to me --Open2universe | Talk 01:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support We could use more Admins, with a higher chance of there being one online when someone chooses to wreak havoc like the poster that is trashing pages right now. I sure wish I would have been able to block him... MichielT 20:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support. Know him in english wikipedia, enough said. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support per Majorly. Maxim(talk) 19:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I've worked with AD on en.wp and Meta. He's good; no concerns whatsoever. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. support (if I am allowed to vote here) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 03:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Quality user & admin where I have come across him --Herby talk thyme 15:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Absolutely. Very thoughtful user, especially with the sysop buttons. Mike.lifeguard | @meta 22:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

OhanaUnited

Poll closed. OhanaUnited is an admin now. Open2universe | Talk 15:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello WikiSpecies editors. Over my 1.5 months in WikiSpecies, I came across vandalisms and "garbage" articles. If I was admin, I could delete those articles that do not follow the page name convention and block those vandals that have received multiple warnings urging them to stop. Therefore, I ask the community to place your trust in me so that I can serve the community as an administrator. OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Support

  1. Ok. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ucucha (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Open2universe | Talk 15:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I keep seeing his name whenever I clear out Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. It'd be nice for him to be able to do it himself. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. With more than 8000 wikimedia contributions of which some Meta and Zh. Lycaon 14:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

(Do we need a neutral section?) OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monobi

Hi. I'm again requesting adminship. I intend to help with the speedy deletion category, which can get clogged at sometimes. I previously had an rfa on Wikispecies in December (link) and it has been three months since. I know I haven't been really active, but I often seen vandalism while monitoring on IRC and it would better to just delete the page instead of tagging it. I also had a commons RfA which should probably be read over, although it doesn't pertain much to Wikispecies. (commons rfa is here). Thank you, Mønobi 20:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vote starts 1 March 2008 20:23, vote closes 8 March 2008 20:23 (UTC). Ucucha (talk) 07:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Monobi is an admin now. Ucucha (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support, gladly. Maxim(talk) 23:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes, especially when he knows how to make bots and I'm asking him to create one to generate articles on WikiSpecies. Why didn't you tell us you were going for RfA on commons? We could have votestacked it for you :P OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll let you know next time ;). Mønobi 01:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. For sure. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ucucha (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Cabal support Majorly (talk) 22:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Monobi has gotten plenty of Wikispecies-specific experience since his last RfA. EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support --Open2universe | Talk 13:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Retrieved from "https://species.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikispecies:Administrators/Archive_1&oldid=3622463"