Please ask further questions in the Village Pump. We hope you'll enjoy the time you spend on Wikispecies! |
- UtherSRG 18:01, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Please don't add "no:" links for articles not yet written on the Norsk Wikipedia. As for your list of unnkowns on your user page, I would suggest going to the English Wikipedia to find and create all the articles on Wikipecies needed to drill down to that species. - UtherSRG 06:40, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments. (Is this the best place to answer you?)
- Sorry, I thought it was better to have the Norwegian name on the page, regardless of whether there is an article there or not. Please excuse my newbie actions. :)
- When you click on a link that doesn't have an article, you come to a page saying "There isn't anything here, do you want to add it?". I see it as being similar to a red link within Wikispecies. Isn't the link just added information? What is the philosophy behind not wanting it?
- When it comes to species not being there, I intend to go through that list at some point. Using Wikipedia to find out where they go is a good suggestion.
- The difference is that a "red link" is obvious. If you intend to dd the Norsk links, then please at least add a stub article on the Norsk Wikipedia. - UtherSRG 22:48, 13 August 2005 (UTC)