The status, affinity, scope or nomenclature of this taxon is disputed.

Please see discussion on the talk page.

Chamaenerion fleischeri

Taxonavigation

edit
Taxonavigation: Myrtales 
Classification System: APG IV

Superregnum: Eukaryota
Regnum: Plantae
Cladus: Angiosperms
Cladus: Eudicots
Cladus: Core eudicots
Cladus: Rosids
Cladus: Eurosids II
Ordo: Myrtales

Familia: Onagraceae
Subfamilia: Onagroideae
Tribus: Epilobieae
Genus: Chamaenerion
Sectiones: C. sect. Chamaenerion – C. sect. Rosmarinifolia
Species: C. angustifolium – C. bondarenkoi – C. bordzilovskyi – C. colchicum – C. conspersum – C. dodonaei – C. fleischeri – C. latifolium – C. speciosum – C. stevenii

Source(s) of checklist: 

Nothospecies: C. × prantlii – No valid combination under this taxon

Name

edit

Chamaenerion Ség., Pl. Veron. 3: 168 (1754), nom. superfl. or nom. illeg. as not including present type species according to Holub (1972), but accepted as legitimate and validly published by Sennikov (2011) under ICN Art. 11.3.

  • Type species: Chamaenerion angustifolium (L.) Scop., Fl. Carniol., ed. 2. 1: 271. (1771)

Note: Very often found as a synonym of Epilobium s.l. see Govaerts et al. (2023). As yet, there is no definitive evidence for favouring one taxonomic opinion over another and therefor WS must have separate taxon pages for each opinion

Synonyms

edit
  • Homotypic
    • Chamerion Raf., Herb. Raf. 51 (1833), nom. nud.
    • Epilobium subg. Chamerion Raf., Amer. Monthly Mag. & Crit. Rev. 2: 266 (1818), nom. inval.
    • Chamerion (Raf.) Raf. ex Holub, Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 7(1): 85. (1972).
  • Heterotypic
    • Chamaenerion Hill, Suppl. Chamber's Cyclop. (Scott) (1753), nom. inval., opus utiq. oppr.
    • Chamaenerion (Gesn.) Ludw. (1760), vide J.A. Nieuwland (American Midland Naturalist 1(1): 18 (Apr. 1909).
    • Chamaenerion Gray, Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. 2: 559 (1821), nom. illeg. non Ség. (1754).
    • Chamaenerium Spach, Hist. Nat. Vég. 4: 396 (1835).
    • Pyrogennema Lunell, Amer. Midl. Naturalist 4: 482 (1916).

Note:

edit

The correct name for this genus has been solved satisfactorily according to most authorities. Chamaenerion Ség. (1754) does lack a generic description or diagnosis, however, the genus name was validly published by indirect reference to the generic description in Séguier (Pl. Veron. 1: 401. 1745), therefore, it has precedence (Sennikov, 2011). Incidentally, Chamaenerion Ség. (1754), when segregated from Epilobium L. (1753), is used by almost all authorities except for the Flora of China.

References

edit

Primary references

edit
  • Seguier, J.F. Plantae Veronenses, seu Stirpium quae in Agro Veronensi Reperiuntur Methodica Synopsis. Veronae 3: 168.

Additional references

edit
edit

Vernacular names

edit
башҡортса: Боланут
čeština: vrbovka
dansk: Gederams
eesti: Põdrakanep
suomi: Maitohorsmat
հայերեն: Նեղտերևի
қазақша: Иваншай
norsk: Geitramsslekta
polski: Wierzbówka
русский: Иван-чай
slovenčina: kyprina
svenska: Mjölkesläktet
  For more multimedia, look at Chamerion on Wikimedia Commons.