Talk:Parakeelya

The segregation of these combinations is not accepted by Australian botanists (APC, 2017 & Hernández-Ledesma et al., 2015) they preferred its incorporation into Calandrinia Kunth (1823) s.l. . However, this taxon page is maintained for now with reference to Nyffeler & Eggli, (2010) and Ogburn & Edwards, (2015). Andyboorman (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

The decisions to conserve Parakeelya is neither accepted nor rejected (Applequist, 2023). Therefore, if ICN is applied Rumicastrum will continue to be used, if the Australian Calandrinia are segregated. However, before the taxon page can be redirected all species combinations will need checking/screening for equivalents. Andyboorman (talk) 20:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)