Talk:Dianthus hyssopifolius subsp. hyssopifolius

The application of the name Dianthus monspessulanus has been confused for some time and there is not much agreement in the litterature. It started with Linnaeus who gave the same plant two different names i two different books, Dianthus monspeliacus (in Systema Naturae, ed. 10) and Dianthus monspessulanus (in Amoenitates Academicae).

To cite the The Linnaean Plant Name Typification Project: "Laínz & Muñoz Garmendia (in Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 44: 571-572. 1987) clarified the typification of D. hyssopifolius and they, and Bernal & al. (in Castroviejo & al., Fl. Iberica 2: 426-462. 1990) have treated it and D. monspeliacus as synonymous. The typifications made by Bernal Cid for both D. monspeliacus and D. monspessulanus formalise this position."

I have followed this view here Uleli (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Dianthus hyssopifolius subsp. hyssopifolius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304220547/http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Carga.php?Pagina=F(497.1)SCU_Fl_Carniol_ed2_1/SCU_Fl_Carniol_ed2_1_403.pdf to http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Carga.php?Pagina=F(497.1)SCU_Fl_Carniol_ed2_1/SCU_Fl_Carniol_ed2_1_403.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 5 June 2023 (UTC)