Talk:Chrysuronia brevirostris

Latest comment: 8 years ago by RobHickling in topic Author

Author edit

Weller (2009) has now said that the earlier brevirostris is valid. See http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/zoos.200800020/abstract So the citation should be restored to (Lesson, 1829). RobHickling (talk) 21:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Chrysuronia brevirostris" page.