Talk:Monomorium fieldi

Dispute

• the synonymy with Monomorium antipodum is uncertain, based in part on apparent differences in alkaloids between Australian and New Zealand populations (Don, 2007: 112). Note that if the synonymy is upheld, then Monomorium antipodum is the valid name for the species by priority. The only reason to use the name M. fieldi for New Zealand material would be if the identity of Monomorium antipodum cannot be established with certainty from the original description or type material, in which case the name Monomorium antipodum would be a nomen dubium. It is unclear to me at present if that is in fact the case.

Distribution

• Australia
• New Zealand

External links modified

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Monomorium fieldi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721043709/http://www.ento.org.nz/nzentomologist/free_issues/Weta30_1_2005/Weta30_14_15.pdf to http://www.ento.org.nz/nzentomologist/free_issues/Weta30_1_2005/Weta30_14_15.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Monomorium fieldi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724080723/http://species-id.net/wiki/Monomorium_fieldi to http://www.species-id.net/wiki/Monomorium_fieldi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)