Talk:Gompelia

Latest comment: 2 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Nomenclatural notes

edit
  • Otolelus was proposed as a new replacement name for Olotelus Mulsant & Rey, 1866, but remains unavailable according to Alonso-Zarazaga (2010)
  • again according to Alonso-Zarazaga (2010), Xylophilus pruinosus Kiesenwetter, 1861 is not the type species of Gompelia
  • ICZN Article 69.1.1. 'In the absence of a prior type fixation for a nominal genus or subgenus, an author is deemed to have designated one of the originally included nominal species as type species, if he or she states (for whatever reason, right or wrong) that it is the type or type species, or uses an equivalent term, and if it is clear that that author accepts it as the type species'
  • Nardi (2007: 25) stated that 'Xylophilus pruinosus is one of the four nominal species originally included in Olotelus Mulsant & Rey, 1866a, so Klinger's type species designation is valid (Article 67.2 and 67.8). This species has become also the type species of Olotelus Mulsant & Rey (Article 67.8)'
  • it is therefore clear that Nardi (2007: 25) accepted Xylophilus pruinosus Kiesenwetter, 1861 as the type species of Olotelus Mulsant & Rey, 1866, albeit for the wrong reasons
  • this threatens to make Gompelia Alonso-Zarazaga, 2010 a junior subjective synonym of Cobososia Collado & Alonso-Zarazaga, 1996
  • I am ignoring this complication, pending further clarification ...

References

edit
edit

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Gompelia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Gompelia" page.